WEDNESDAY, JULY 23, 2008 
 

HOME
CLASSIFIEDS

THE LATEST
BLADEWIRE
BLADEBLOG

NEWS
VIEWPOINT
LOCAL LIFE
ARTS
TELEVISION
THEATE
ABOUT US

EMAIL UPDATES
New to email
updates? Then click here to find out more.

email address
subscribe
unsubscribe
I have read and agree to our terms
and conditions
.


ADVERTISING
GENERAL INFO
MARKETING

ABOUT US
ABOUT NYBLADE
MASTHEAD
EMPLOYMENT


Movie posters made obscene by pictures of naked men are the specialty of art photographer Rinaldo Hopf

MORE INFO
Rinaldo Hopf
Jan. 13– 29
Art at Large
630 Ninth Ave.
The Film Center #707
212-957-8371
www.artatlarge.com


Sound Off about this article

Printer-friendly Version

E-Mail this story

Search the Blade

advertisement

advertisement

THE ARTS

Poster boys

By Gerard Robinson
Friday, January 14, 2005

With the exception of a sunny portrait of Quentin Crisp taken in 1995 in New York City, the photographs and posters of the German photographer and illustrator Rinaldo Hopf are remarkably ugly — which, I hasten to add, is obviously the point.

I can imagine fans of the photographer calling them “honest”; others may just find them rude and invasive.

The photos might be by John Waters if Hopf had a sense of humor. The work is being exhibited under the title “Subversiv,” which is a fancy way of saying, “If you don’t like them, you’re not hip enough to appreciate the grotesque.”

The monograph produced by the exhibition looks like a document from the ‘60s: direct lighting, fruity colors, whacked out subjects. In one,” Bridge Markland” (2000), a naked bald woman — a flower child — with her nipples covered by red tape holds flowers in her hands and stares blankly up at the photographer as if waiting for the answer to a question. In another, entitled “Werner Rogglin” (2002), an aging queen with a bad toupee stares down at the camera querulously. He might be asking, “What do you think you’re doing?”

What’s being subverted here could also be called discretion and good taste. I felt uneasy about the way the photographer seems to be exploiting his subjects.

Hopf is not in the same class as Diane Arbus (who, God knows, also exploited her subjects for their oddness or eccentricities). But whatever you think of Arbus, she tricked up an unmistakable style of portraiture that was fascinatingly all her own.

Here Hopf works close in, in in-your-face, bright, garish colors; but he produces no image that you want to linger over. One glance at each one tells you all you need to know: What was the subject thinking in allowing the exploitation?

Take the blasé photograph of a naked young woman “Tina Maria” (1997) in a beret smoking a cigarette in what looks like a movie theater. The photo is unerotic — as a matter of fact, anti-erotic — the lighting is harsh, the color is saturated. The picture, like the seated nude, just sits there waiting for you to avert your gaze.

In another, “JN Ulrick Desert & Stephen L. Schmersal” (1998), a naked black man reclining on a couch with a basket of flowers balanced on his head is fanned by a white man wearing only briefs. The fan has photographs of Martin Luther King on it. I guess you would have to ask the photographer what this cracked piece is supposed to be about.

Can it be that the photograph is racist? Or is it an ironic, post-modern comment on racism? It seems to hint at some kind of subservience of white men to black men. Anyway, you have to ask: Why is Martin Luther King being used this way?

In perhaps the most bizarre picture, entitled “Arschvoli-Charlotte von Mahlsdorf” (the real-life transgendered subject of the play “I Am My Own Wife, 1997), an elderly white-haired woman smiles as a much younger male companion paddles her.

There are a couple of homoerotic photographs in the show itself. But most a lot more are in the monograph, including the best of the bunch, a man in a suit jacket and tie getting a blow job in a junk yard. In another shot (also not included in the exhibition) he urinates into a partner’s mouth.)

A couple of other pseudo-biblical nudes, two men on stone steps that, let us imagine, is an ancient ruin (“Alfredo & Husseyin in Berlin,” 2003), look as though they are auditioning for the ‘60s rock variety TV show “Shindig,” with their arms fully extended a la the Supremes’ “Stop in the Name of Love.”

But the real homoeroticism in this artist’s work are movie posters over which he has overlaid — scrawled might be a better word — gold-leaf and ink drawings of naked men. Ralf Köenig, who wrote the monograph, calls this series a “personal graffiti/glorification … set against authentic elements of pop culture, (which creates) a new collectibility in and of itself.”

Hardly.

None of these artifacts is particularly collectible. Do you really want a poster of “American Psycho” or “Shaft” with naked-man “graffiti” layered over them?

about us

© 2008 |  HX Media, LLC  | Privacy Policy